Jan.6 panel weighs contempt after brief statement to former Trump Justice Department official Clark

Rep. Bennie thompsonBennie Gordon Thompson Jan. The January 6 panel has interviewed more than 150 people so far. The January 6 committee grants deferrals to Jeffrey Clark, Dan Scavino. (D-Miss.), The chairman of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on Capitol Hill, said he would not rule out contempt charges against Jeffrey Clark, a former Trump Justice Department official implicated in the efforts of the former president to advance his claims of electoral fraud.

“It’s under consideration, absolutely,” Thompson said.

Thompson’s comments came after a relatively brief statement with Clark, who sat down with committee staff on Friday and apparently declined to answer questions.

Clark Photos arriving and leaving The statement shared by CNN and CBS reporters suggests that he sat with investigators for less than two hours, a short period of time, considering how long such statements can last.

The committee sought Clark’s testimony because he was at the center of Trump’s election efforts at the Justice Department.

“You proposed that the department send a letter to state legislators in Georgia and other states suggesting that they delay the certification of their election results and hold a press conference announcing that the department was investigating allegations of voter fraud,” the panel wrote for the Camera on his summons to Clark.

The Hill was the first to report that Clark planned to sit down with the committee on Friday after parting ways with his attorney just a week ago.

The committee declined to comment on the content of Clark’s statement or how cooperative it was.

But a letter from Clark’s new attorney to the committee obtained by Political On Friday it suggests that the former mid-level Justice Department attorney had little interest in answering the investigation questions.

“Mr. Clark, of course, you will abide by a future court decision (s) that properly govern all underlying disputes firmly, but for now you must decline to testify as a threshold matter because the president’s confidences are not yours to. resign, “writes attorney Harry MacDougald. in a letter to Thompson.

“Consequently, beyond coming forward today to present this letter as a token of your respect for a House committee, even though it was not formed in compliance with the regular minority participation process, Mr. Clark is unable to answer questions from deposition at this time, ”the letter continues.

The letter resembles one written by an attorney for the former White House strategist. Steve BannonStephen (Steve) Kevin Bannon Jan. Panel 6 has interviewed more than 150 people so far, Trump Justice Department attorney Jeffrey Clark, to testify before the January 6 panel. Friday’s subpoenas are a concern real for lawmakers facing questions from Jan.6 PLUS. who was also subpoenaed by the committee and argued that he could not testify due to former executive privilege claims President TrumpDonald Trump White House Calls on Senate Democrats to Meet with Powell This Month: Justice Department Report Sues Texas for New Electoral Reform Good Republicans in Government May Be Democracy’s Last Hope MORE.

Bannon, unlike Clark, did not physically appear before the committee, a move that ultimately resulted in notable censure from the House as a whole, which voted to refer him to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution.

The Justice Department has yet to make a decision on the matter, but on Thursday the department defended the administration in a Trump lawsuit that seeks to prevent the committee from accessing his presidential records.

Clark has previously refused to sit down with Congressional investigators; did not cooperate with the Senate Judiciary Committee, as it produced a report detailing Trump’s lobbying campaign at the Justice Department, including his one-time plan to install Clark as interim attorney general if high-level officials do not. they acted on their electoral claims.

That report found that Clark “participated in an unauthorized investigation of allegations of voter fraud and did not comply with the department’s policy on contacts with the White House.”

Clark’s attorney, Atlanta-based MacDougald, previously worked with Sidney Powell to challenge election results in Georgia, one of the states where Clark wanted the Justice Department to intervene.



Reference-thehill.com

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *