WaPost won’t release Trump’s full response due to ‘unrelated incendiary claims’

“The Post’s investigation was based on interviews with 230 people and thousands of pages of court documents and internal law enforcement reports, along with hundreds of videos, photos and audio recordings,” the newspaper said. said in an introduction to the three-part series published Monday. “The Post provided Trump with a list of 37 reported findings as part of its investigation.”

A Trump spokesperson, Taylor Budowich, provided a statement to the outlet. The Post said the statement was “a lengthy written response that included a number of unrelated incendiary claims that The Post is not publishing in their entirety.”

The Post noted that Budowich said the former president “strongly opposed” all of the newspaper’s findings, dismissing them as “fake news” and describing the people who carried out acts of violence on Capitol Hill that day as “agitators. not associated with President Trump. “

The full statement the Post chose not to include also indicated that the 2020 presidential election was rigged, a claim that has been widely discredited by government officials and officials from both parties.

The Post’s investigation looked into the weeks leading up to the Jan.6 incident. He said Trump, his legal representatives and his political allies promoted misleading claims about voter fraud that contributed to the events of January 6. He also analyzed the extent to which law enforcement officials did not adequately prepare for the attack on the Capitol.

Critics of the former president in Congress and in the media have said that his claims about a “rigged” election led directly to violence on January 6.

“The media’s obsession with the January 6 protest is a blatant attempt to overshadow a simple fact: There is no greater threat to the United States than left-wing journalists and fake news, who have avoided careful scrutiny of the rigged elections. 2020 “, a part of the Budowich statement that the Post did publish reads:” The media, like the Democrats, do not want to see safe and honest elections. Instead of reporting the facts, media like the Washington Post sow division, hatred and lies, as it is doing with this story. “

Last week, the Wall Street Journal defended the publication of a letter to the editor of Triumph who alleged widespread voter fraud in Pennsylvania, but called his claims “bananas.”
“The progressive pastors of the press are in an uproar that we published a letter to the editor Thursday from former President Trump, objecting to our editorial noting that Pennsylvania lost last year by 80,555 votes,” the Journal said. “We trust that our readers will make their own decisions about your statement. And we think it’s news when a former president who could run in 2024 wrote what he did, even if (or maybe especially if) his claims are bananas. ”

A poll in June found that a third of Americans believe the elections were not conducted fairly, and a majority of Republicans have indicated in other polls that they strongly support Trump, with many saying they want to see him run for president. again.

“As for the clergy of the media, their attempts to censor Mr. Trump have done nothing to diminish his popularity,” the Journal wrote in his defense. “Our advice would be to examine their own standards after they so easily fell for the false accusations of Russian collusion. They would have more credibility in refuting Trump’s.”



Reference-thehill.com

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *